
Sighting a pressing TV industry need to monetize the "massive interest in online (video) content,"
eMarketer.com summarized an
Informa Telecoms & Media research report (which I could not find on their site) including numbers that would make almost any venture investor salivate. For example, "In the US alone, revenues are forecast to rise from $538 million in 2006 to nearly $4 billion in 2012."
"These trends are now so pronounced, that the term 'social revolution' no longer seems too much of an exaggeration," said Adam Thomas of Informa.
Personally, today, I was checking out
VideoEgg.com which boasts an easy to use video upload, Flash compress, and, yes, video editing platform as well as a pretty impressive online video ad network that's focused on social networking sites.
Does anyone have a good comparison of all these new Web 2.0 video platforms?
TechCruch seems to think that
SplashCast may have the ultimate player platform.
I wish it was like the Videography days when I could get paid to research and write about this stuff. Who knows, if I can find a way to monetize it, maybe I'll be doing some video clips soon. Potential channels would include internet marketing, online video, and
the joy of golf. But should I do SplashCast channels, distribute via the VideoEggNetwork, BrightCove, all of the above, or what?!?
Labels: internet advertising, internet marketing, internet video, online video, user generated content, user generated video, web 2.0